Raising finance for the company……..
Raising finance for multinational enterprises, collaborative ventures & foreign subsidiaries
When the point comes to raise finance for an organization, mainly 2 options are available: debt and equity. These capital sources have their own benefits and losses. It is essential to strike a strong balance between equity financing and debt financing, it clearly states that measuring the advantages and cost of debt and equity, it is needed to ensure that the company that one cannot stick the firm with debt one cannot repay and minimise the cost of capital (Nasery, 2012).
Debt financing form has been taken as a common in loans which is issued for some time period that will acquire interest in most of the cases. Equity financing can be attained by acquiring duties from all the investors in share form. Both equity and debt are known as valid financing sources and it is more crucial that business areas have to involve both financing methods along with the option to use in combination of each other. It can produce sense of borrowing money for the purpose to cover entire cost to purchase newer equipments but the financing ford development can only come from the venture capital. With the combination of debt and equity, one can maximize the funds while designing the repayments of debt as well as the responsibilities to the shareholders for meeting with the requirements.
For an example, UK banks like the bank of England are needed to maximize its capital. Restrictive bonuses and the dividends do not take place to generate the required amount of capital and now the need of external financing has taken place. International financing can be proved as major option for the banks in UK and they will be more capable in sourcing enough amount of the fiancé from the organizations in UK (Martin, 2012). Furthermore, getting hold of the debt financing option, it may lead to the bank crash. So the debt and equity ratio may be needed to be weighed up in one of the case just before any type of financing starts.
With so many choices for companies
for raising their capital, any form of either debit or equity finance would be
an acceptable choice. However, when companies doing well like Facebook it
allows the company to be more recognised worldwide. Facebook is a company
currently in the headline for its IPO. On first of February 2012 Facebook
announced its IPO, and is expected to offer up to $5bn. .As a result
Mark z (Facebook CEO) is eager to give the smallest volume of equity away to
the public.
Another
recent example of the company raising finance is YELP the user generated review
website, plans to raise as much as $100 million in what may be the first
initial public offering from a major internet company this year.
Yelp, the local-ad driven social review site launched a record-breaking IPO today (Bloomsberg, 2012). Analysts believe the IPO could raise as much as $100m, a valuation even greater than Facebook which filed at record levels less than a month ago (IBT, 2012). However Yelp and Facebook are in direct competition in many areas of their revenue generation which typically focuses on the local ad market (Forbes, 2012). Have Yelp learned from the issues of Facebook in bringing their offering to the public? Some analysts are still concerned that Yelp is over-valued. In light of Facebook's success, probably not.
Yelp, the local-ad driven social review site launched a record-breaking IPO today (Bloomsberg, 2012). Analysts believe the IPO could raise as much as $100m, a valuation even greater than Facebook which filed at record levels less than a month ago (IBT, 2012). However Yelp and Facebook are in direct competition in many areas of their revenue generation which typically focuses on the local ad market (Forbes, 2012). Have Yelp learned from the issues of Facebook in bringing their offering to the public? Some analysts are still concerned that Yelp is over-valued. In light of Facebook's success, probably not.
The IPO
for YELP as cited in (Bloomberg) will probably come ahead of Facebook Inc., the
biggest social networking website, which field to raise $5billion on Feb.1,
without setting terms. At the midpoint of the price range Yelps offering would
value the company at about $778million, or about 9.3 times last year’s sale.
That compares with 5.2 times for Google Inc. and about 3.8 times for yahoo
which Yelp lists as competitors in its prospectus.
Although
the IPO for yelp is higher than Facebook but I think Facebook will raise
an unprecedented amount of money which will allow them to invest in projects
that help the company grow and because Facebook is a highly
desirable and popular business. The other reasing for that is that the IPO for
Facebook isn’t to raise finance for a company who was in trouble like Yelp
which yelp’s net loss last year widened to $16.7 million from $9.6 in 2010.
Surely the driving force behind
this strategy is the resurgent tech IPO market. More specifically, Facebook,
which is aiming to go public this spring in what is expected to be the biggest
Internet IPO in history. Facebook has been the most actively traded stock on
Second Market since the company launched its private stock market.
However, Yelp is not in
financial green pastures. On net revenues of $83.3 million last year, Yelp lost
$16.9 million. Its revenues were up 75% year over year, but its losses rose by
a similar 74%. According to the New York Times, at the middle of its expected
initial stock price, Yelp would be valued at $778 million.
While the company has grown
quickly, it has long faced doubts about its ability to survive as a standalone
firm, not least because of its prickly relationship with Google. Yelp has
repeatedly accused Google of "scraping" its business listings and
reviews of restaurants, bars, and retailers without agreement or compensation
for use in its own Google Local service.
Yelp has never had a yearly
profit, losing money every year since it was born.
While the IPO market for
technology companies has been open, if not exceptionally forgiving, the market
reception of this IPO, which is less fundamentally sound from a technical
perspective than other profitable tech firms, will be bell weather. If Yelp
finds open arms from investors, it could lead to increased activity. A frigid
reception could delay others from making the same move.
In conclusion, we can see number
of reason behind the company’s strategy when they raise their finance and the
companies doing that not always to fund the future project.
Refrence list:
http://mariamnasery.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/raising-finance-for-multinational.html
http://mariamnasery.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/raising-finance-for-multinational.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-16835116
[accessed 16.02.2012]
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-16/yelp-seeks-to-raise-as-much-as-100-million-in-ipo-of-user-review-website.html
[accessed 18.02.2012]
https://elp.northumbria.ac.uk/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_id=_2_1&url=%2fwebapps%2fblackboard%2fexecute%2flauncher%3ftype%3dCourse%26id%3d_224844_1%26url%3d
[accessed 18.02.2012]
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-01/facebook-files-to-raise-up-to-5-billion-in-ipo-of-social-networking-site.html[accessed 16.02.2012]
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-01/facebook-files-to-raise-up-to-5-billion-in-ipo-of-social-networking-site.html[accessed 16.02.2012]
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-01/facebook-files-to-raise-up-to-5-billion-in-ipo-of-social-networking-site.html[accessed 16.02.2012]
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57368449-93/three-reasons-facebook-has-to-go-public/[accessed 16.02.2012]


No comments:
Post a Comment